The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus

The Life & Adventures of Santa Claus (1985) is a Rankin & Bass adaptation of the 1902 L. Frank Baum children’s book, and it is superbly Weird.

Here’s a link to a short article on the film from Odeon Review and one from Comics Alliance, where Chris Sims offers a summary/review with so much enthusiasm that I almost caught a moment of spirit while reading it:

“[I]t is awesome. And it definitely tells you a lot about Santa Claus, like how he was weaned on the milk of a lioness, raised by immortals who taught him to speak the language of birds, and learned of man’s inhumanity to man by being astrally projected to Japan to watch children train to kill each other as samurai.”

tumblr_nzuf1dh1hP1rtj3g0o5_250

Almost.
It is one of the few films from our fairly limited selection of “Holiday Weird/Holiday Horror” options that I can comfortably recommend, and I think it’s my favorite of the Rankin & Bass holiday specials.

image

The book by L. Frank Baum is in the public domain and can be read here (pdf). There’s also a recent re-telling of the tale by Kelli Ripatti from Compass Media that features some fantastic artwork by Ivica Stevanovic.

Here is Stevanovic’s depiction of the evil Awgwas:

image

Asian Horror

wilbur wilbur i never hear you talk about eastern horror movies and such. have you had the chance to watch any? like Japanese or Korean or Thai horror shows? They are pretty great 😀
wilburwhateley wilburwhateley said:

Hey, there. It’s an excellent point (and a correct one), of course.

image

from Noroi (2005)

I’m an English nerd, and one of the phrases we bookish types in that world (particularly the older…-ish...ones among us) sometimes bandy-about is “it’s not my area”—meaning that something isn’t my area of expertise or not one to which I’ve dedicated much time/energy. This is one of those instances where I feel confident using that phrase. The reason I don’t talk about those films very much is that I’ve never been overwhelmingly drawn to most of them, at least not in the same way that I’m drawn to French, North American, and Spanish productions; nor do I know enough about most of the films under this umbrella to discuss their themes, characters, and complexities in an informed manner. There are many I’ve enjoyed watching, of course, but I couldn’t discuss them in any insightful way beyond the fact that I simply liked ‘em. I tend to stick to my own areas of research here and hope that the folks who follow find them as interesting as I do. And while monsters are universal, I’m still as much a product of my interests, background, and experiences as anyone.
On the other hand, I’m always open for specific recommendations of artists, films, etc. For instance, I doubt that I would have explored much of Junji Ito’s work had it not been recommended by someone (who follows) whose taste I appreciate. I really like Ito’s work, though (again) it’s not what my mind drifts to immediately when I go seeking Horror/Weird content. I mean, when I’ve been neck-deep in Blackwood and Machen for two weeks, I simply don’t think of Ito despite my affection for him. Some of that’s related to exposure, sure, but some of it is still entirely subjective and simply based on what I like. And I think that’s perfectly okay.

image

Junji Ito’s Uzumaki

I’ll mention a few of my favorites from the world of Asian Horror since I haven’t  mentioned them very often, if at all. One is Takashi Miike’s Audition (1999). I also likedRigor Mortis (2013) a lot, though mainly for the visual artistry. It really is a strikingly eerie film. I caught The Host (2006) on Netflix, and it didn’t disappoint—its monster, especially. And Tokyo Gore Police (2008) is a long-time guilty pleasure of mine. I like it a lot, and it always feels like I’m watching something that should have been on stage at the Grand Guignol whenever I revisit the thing. It’s so over-the-top. Also, a follower suggested that I watch Noroi (2005) a year or so ago, and I liked it…though I remain a little numb to most found footage/documentary-style movies. Finally, Strange Circus (2005) disturbed the hell out of me, and the feeling of unease that it evoked lingered for days after viewing it. I don’t know if I’d necessarily recommend it to anyone (anyone I like anyway), but it’s certainly an experience.

image

from The Host (2006)

If there are followers (and I know there are) with a specialized interest in Asian Horror and/or have some Cosmic Horror, Weird, or Monster-centered content you’d like to share, please send it along and I will share it in this space. And, as always, I love getting recommendations—particularly for content that I don’t generally encounter in my little niche. On the HPL front, I’m fairly certain I’ve mentioned a brief essay/article by Justin Mullis for Lovecraft eZine on The Cthulhu Mythos in Japan. It’s an interesting read, so I’ll link it here, again.

Thanks for the ask and have a very nice rest of your week!

Lovecraft and Cosmicism

This post originated as a response to a request for Lovecraftian Horror movie suggestions on the other blog. I’m including here as what will be an ever-expanding list of Cosmic Horror and the Weird on film.

This is a notoriously frustrating subject….with a few great exceptions. I’ll try to highlight those and direct readers to additional resources they might explore.

image

from In the Mouth of Madness (1994)

Note:  I’ve taken the opportunity to combine a couple of previous posts with the content written for this response, so this is lengthy. I just wanted to everything in one spot. Hope it’s useful to someone!

There is a quality to Lovecraft’s work that often defies visual representation, and part of what makes Weird Fiction weird is that it “veils,” or doesn’t show too much…it relies on atmosphere and dread to generate fear. The reader is intended to “do the work,” so when revealed on screen his monsters often tend to look a bit, well, goofy or, worse, directors overcompensate the inability to capture the horror from the stories by shoveling-in sex and gore.

A lot of the films I’ve listed here, for that reason, are “Lovecraftian” rather than direct adaptations. I think it was Kenneth Hite (?) I heard say once that one of the best Lovecraftian films he’s seen includes no characters or ideas from the Mythos–The Thing (the original, not the one of which we never speak). I will, however, include adaptations, of course. **I’ll put asterisks next to the titles that are adaptations or that, at least, are recognizably based-upon one of Lovecraft’s works.

image

    First, here are a few “top” recommendations plucked out of the long list. I figure it’s pretty overwhelming, so this might be a good place to begin.

The Thing, Prince of Darkness, and In the Mouth of Madness make up what Carpenter refers to as “The Apocalypse Trilogy.” See the excellent article from Strange Horizons for more on the Trilogy and Lovecraft’s influences on Carpenter, linked here.  If there’s one of them you have not seen, go watch it now. Go.  🙂

  • The Thing (1982)
  • Prince of Darkness (1987)
  • In the Mouth of Madness (1994)

Also the following are among my favorites out of the longer list below and highly-recommended:

Check out Lovecraft: Fear of the Unknown (2008); it’s a nice documentary on the author.

image

************************************************

Film List, combined:

  • Absentia (2011)—if you haven’t had the opportunity to view this film, please do. It is definitely Lovecraftian in its atmosphere and tension reliant upon setting/“external” reality, its invocation of mythology, the existence of a “world beneath or just outside,” as well as its unhappy ending.
  • The Banshee Chapter (2013)—a fantastic sort of variation on the Resonator–tons of creepy atmosphere and “veiled” horror.
  • The Whisperer in Darkness (2011)**
  • The Corridor (2012)—I wobble a bit when categorizing this as Lovecraftian; I would certainly place it in the realm of the Weird, and it’s a good movie.
  • The Mist (2007)—based on the King novel, of course, I have always believed this to be an underrated film; it is one of his most Lovecraftian stories, and it has been adapted wonderfully to film. The best monster in the bunch, in my opinion, is the tentacled creature that we never actually see in full–that big, lumbering fellow.
  • Yellowbrick Road (2010)—90 percent of this film is a wonderful representation (albeit a low-budget one) of what can be done with Cosmic horror; the final 10 percent left me cursing at the screen, but you can judge for yourself.
  • The Burrowers (2008)—excellent horror movie, in my opinion, though I want to shake the creators for showing the monsters so clearly towards the end. If they’d left them almost/partially unseen, it would have been perfectly Weird and utterly terrifying.
  • The Shrine (2010)—this is another film I really like that I think is a tad underrated. It’s not perfect by any means, and I wish they wouldn’t have “explained” so much, but the premise is fantastic and it has some genuinely scary parts.
  • The Curse (1987)**this is a Wil Wheaton film, and thanks to a follower a few weeks ago, I learned that there are several more (terrible) adaptations in this line of movies. For instance, The Curse II is an adaptation of The Curse of Yig(don’t watch it or any of the rest of them).
  • Wishmaster (1997)—the quality of this isn’t that high, but I’ve always liked it, particularly the beginning. There are many Lovecraftian punishments meted-out just in the first 7 minutes alone.
image

from Wishmaster (1997)

  • Monsters (2010)—I catch a little grief for liking this movie as much as I do. I confess that I love it, however, primarily for the giant, glowing, tentacled mating-aliens-at-a-gas-station scene. How great is that?
  • The Objective (2008)such a great movie; be warned, though, that its setting is Afganistan and includes all of the trappings of War. I’m not a fan, usually, of that type of movie, but this is well worth tolerating the guns and silly machismo to get to the fascinating integration of myth and Weirdness.
  • Jeepers Creepers (2001)—this is one of my favorite horror movies (Lovecraftian and otherwise). I love that it’s a brother/sister team and that the film isn’t propped-up on a sexual/romantic subplot that has little to do with the actual story, that it presents a “new” and truly weird sort of creature, that it introduces the monster without making it entirely “supernatural” or “religious”/occult, and that we don’t know all that much more about it by the end of the movie than at the beginning.
image

from Jeepers Creepers (2001)

  • Die Farbe (2010)**—this is a good adaptation of The Colour Out of Space, though many details of the setting and plot are changed. It’s still recognizable as the story.
  • Europa Report (2013)—a friend recommended I watch this, and I was ready to strangle her until the very last portion of the thing. I’m not sure if it’s worth the creature “payoff” to sit-through the tedious first part, but it does have an interesting ending.
  • Event Horizon (1997)—I think I’ve talked enough about this movie on this blog. 🙂
  • H. P. Lovecraft’s Dreams in the Witch House (2005)**—a Stuart Gordon adaptation. It’s pretty bad, but if you want to be thorough, it’s a necessary watch.
  • Re-Animator (1985)**—Stuart Gordon; this film has a huge cult following, particularly among Lovecraftians. I’ve never cared for it, but many adore it. It’s a decent adaptation of Herbert West—Reanimator that takes many liberties.The sexual content is a bit over the top (especially compared to the story), so be aware of its presence.
  • From Beyond (1986)**—Stuart Gordon; adaptation of the story with the same name. I like this Gordon film, though it drips with (non-Lovecraftian) sex, as well. I heard, though, an argument made (somewhere) regarding the pituitary gland and sexual response; the individual claimed it reasonable to expect heightened sex-drive if the gland were stimulated by the Resonator… so there’s that.
  • Dagon (2001)**—Stuart Gordon; this is actually The Shadow Over Innsmouth…or something close to it, at least. Closer to that than Dagon, that’s for certain.
  • Castle Freak (1995)**—Stuart Gordon; I love that the wiki article describes this as “slightly based” on the story, The Outsider. 
  • The Dunwich Horror (1970)**—this is a Roger Corman film and, as my family back home would say, “hokey as all get out.” It is a B-movie adaptation of the story and stars Dean Stockwell. I think another version was done recently that had him in it, as well. It’s necessary viewing, though, if you’re working through the movie side of this stuff.
  • Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark (2010)—more of a Blackwood-through-HPL-back to Blackwood vibe to this, though it is in this way that del Toro snags the opportunity to introduce younger viewers/readers to Algernon Blackwood’s tales.
  • The Last Winter (2006)another movie that I seem to love but that others don’t (anyone?); I will just say this about it: Wendigo…and not the cannibal version but the Blackwood-esque, “vengeful spirit of bitter cold Nature” Wendigo.
  • The Deaths of Ian Stone (2007)this is a film about a man who is murdered each day and then enters a new reality the next. It’s a bit flawed here and there, but it is an interesting premise and I enjoyed it overall.
  • Cool Air (1999)**—I still haven’t seen this one!
  • Rare Exports (2010)–a Lovecraftian Christmas featuring a giant, monster Santa Claus.
  • The Unnamable (1988)**this is pretty bad, but it is based loosely on the story with the same name and integrates a few regular people/aspects from HPL’s fiction.
  • Lurking Fear (1994)**also very bad; it is loosely based on The Lurking Fear…you have to squint to recognize it, honestly.
  • The Haunted Palace (1963)**—this is based on the plot of The Case of Charles Dexter Ward and stars Vincent Price; again, a lot of liberties, of course, but it’s fun to watch and, well, Vincent Price.

At the Borders/New Weird: 

  • The Damned Thing (Masters of Horror, 2006)—this is very, very loosely based upon theAmbrose Bierce story by the same name.
  • Cigarette Burns (Masters of Horror, 2005)—I have a soft spot for this film by John Carpenter; it focuses on a movie so terrifying that it alters reality/dooms the viewer. Check out a younger Norman Reedus in it, as well.
  • Dead Birds (2004)—This is actually really close in “feel,” story line, and setting to Robert E. Howard’s story Pigeons from Hell; it’s not a direct adaptation but it retains the spirit and general story…and it’s truly creepy.
  • Kill List (2014)—this was another recommendation that didn’t pay off until the final portion. In this case, though, it is worth suffering through all of the (to me) boring hitman/gun-shooting nonsense to get to the great creepy, cultish ending.
  • Midnight Meat Train (2008)—The story by Clive Barker (you can find it in The Books of Blood, Vol. 1) is definitely Lovecraftian; the film adaptation is just over the line, I think, due to gore. It’s still fun to watch; I recommend it.
  • Grabbers (2012)—humor, alcohol, and bizarre creatures from the sea/outer space; I love this movie and love the monsters in it.
  • Frailty (2001)—I used to use this movie when I taught courses in Critical Thinking, specifically in the chapter dedicated to “Perceptions and Belief.” Watched through one lens, it’s a story about child abuse and the brutal making of a serial killing family. Watched through the lens of belief, it’s a story about sin, connections to a higher power, and “avenging angels.” Matthew McConaughey’s presence doesn’t hurt matters either.
  • Jacob’s Ladder (1990)—another great movie about “reality,” memory, and what guilt, in particular, can do to the way we engage the world around us.
image

from Jacob’s Ladder (1990)

  • The Ruins (2008)based on the novel with the same name by Scott Smith, this involves the enormous egos of young American tourists, an “untouchable”/ “unspeakable” horror quarantined on and around Mayan Ruins, and some really smart, murderous vegetation. Lots of body horror and blood in this movie.

This is all terribly, terribly incomplete, I realize, even at this length, and there are a few sites that explore Lovecraftian film in depth or at least to some degree worth mentioning.

Here are a few of those:

  • Unflimable doesn’t update as much as it used to, but the older content is excellent.
  • Mike Davis (Lovecraft eZine) has a nice list going that I’ve seen him update from time to time. Here’s the link to that.
  • The HPLovecraft site maintained by Donovan K. Loucks has a short list that contains mostly older “classics” like The Crimson Cult (1968) and Die, Monster, Die! (1965), with a few mentions of movies from more recent times.
  • The wiki entry on this topic is a bit shaky, at best. Many of the films on the list are not adaptations of works by HPL, though many of them are decently Lovecraftian in mood, content, and stylistic approach. Maybe it’s a picky distinction, but I think it’s misleading to say all of them are based on stories.  Here’s the link.
  • Finally, here’s a link to the HPL Film Festival and Cthulhucon. It includes dates, locations, as well as movie information.

Beyond Cosmic

Hello again! I know cosmic horror is more your fancy, but what are your feelings on other types of horror (general monsters, ghosts, humans as the ultimate evil, etc.)? In the past I would sometimes lump Lovecraftian things as “monster” because of the beings themselves, but I realize they fall into other categories better.

wilburwhateley wilburwhateley said:

Hey, there! Thanks for the great ask.

image

The wing gremlin from Twilight Zone: the Movie (1983); this segment was a (same-name) remake of the William Shatner episode, “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet,” which was an adaptation of the short story by Richard Matheson.

Oh, I love all kinds of monsters and always have.

image

from The Company of Wolves (1984)

How we categorize these things is (to me) both interesting and occasionally frustrating. I’m usually open to any sort of suggested method as long as I can make sense of it…and if the other person isn’t screaming that theirs is absolutely correct. I got into a super-nerdy (verbal, of course…and actually kind of entertaining) slap-fight a year or so ago about the qualities it takes to call a monster “Lovercraftian.” That sort of thing can get ridiculous pretty quickly, but it can also be a lot of fun.
I think categories help us negotiate expectations (thus avoiding disappointment), and I think I mentioned on a post or ask or something a while back that I was really happy to see, for example, del Toro driving-home the point that Crimson Peak is a Gothic Romance and not a Horror movie. Neither is “better” than the other, but knowing how Gothic Romance differs from mainstream Horror and how it’s similar could mean the difference between having a good time at the theater and spending a couple of miserable hours waiting on the gore that doesn’t come (or hiding one’s head behind a popcorn bucket). My point is that what we call things matters. And since I enjoy talking about monsters, it never hurts to talk about labels and such, I think.

image

from Blade II, Goyer/del Toro’s Reaper-mouth Vampire

Now, for your actual question (ha):
I’ve mentioned my thing for werewolves a time or two, and I rarely get tired of them. I even made it through The Twilight Saga years with my affection in tact, and that was a truly dark time.

image

(x)

I spent a good chunk of my early twenties engrossed in Vampire: The Masquerade, so I have a lot of nostalgic affection for those creatures, as well, despite some media-fueled burnout.

image

White Wolf Publishing; 1st edition (March 1, 1996)

I also enjoy traditional ghost stories—folklore, local legends, that sort of thing, as well as the Antiquarian sort that influenced HPL. See M.R. James if you’d like to explore works by the master of that particular subgenre. I also have a not-so-secret and very semi-guilty pleasure thing going with the ghost hunting shows. I don’t actually believe in ghosts (not in any conventional sense of the concept anyway), but that never detracts from my enjoyment of a good haunting story.

image

James McBryde’s illustration for “Oh Whistle and I’ll Come to You, My Lad” from M.R. James’ Ghost Stories of an Antiquary

And if you’ve spent any time around the blog, you know I enjoy Clive Barker’s work. I’m a sucker for a Cenobite, as well as for any of the Nightbreed. Beautiful, beautiful monsters in those worlds. Look at this handsome devil:

image

Nightbreed’s Devil Lude

You mentioned humans/evil humans, and I guess that’s probably the sub-category (?) I like the least in Horror and tend to slot the serial killer/slasher movies under a different Horror umbrella, and it’s just not something to which I’m drawn automatically. That’s not to say there aren’t some great films and books that slide that way, but I usually don’t enjoy purely “evil/homicidal human”-driven Horror. Examples? Orphan comes immediately to mind, as does the Saw franchise. Don’t care for either. There are exceptions, of course. In general, I like my monsters distinctly inhuman and fairly unsympathetic (none of that ‘tragic backstory’ stuff).

Well, that was a crash-run through monsters of interest…and I barely touched the topic! It’s a start, I guess. Thanks for asking the question, however, and for following. 🙂